By Maryse Kok
Shebedino has a lot to offer. Especially the tastiest Ethiopian coffee, if you believe the locals. Indeed, the coffee ceremony in the Woreda Health Office not only provided a nice opportunity for a catch up between the REACHOUT team and the head of the office, Buriso Bulasho, but also brought us warmth and comfort on this cold and rainy day.
Although Shebedino is only 25km from Hawassa, where REACH Ethiopia – partner in the REACHOUT consortium – is located, the bad shape of the road made the trip to the final quality improvement evaluation workshop uncomfortable and time consuming. Arriving at the venue of the meeting, nine health centre level quality improvement teams were all ready to present their progress over the past year.
The health centre quality improvement teams comprise of five members: the head of the health centre (chair), the health management information system and maternal and child health coordinators, a health extension workers’ (HEWs’) supervisor and the Woreda Health Office focal person for that particular health centre.
As such, the diversity of workshop participants was wide and therefore I was impressed by the fact that all had the same understanding about what quality in primary health services entails. In line with the national healthcare quality strategy, quality care was defined as:
"Comprehensive care that is measurably safe, effective, patient-centered, and uniformly delivered in a timely way that is affordable to the Ethiopian population and appropriately utilizes resources and services efficiently"
The process of quality improvement, the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle, was explained by several presenters. Earlier the quality improvement teams selected ten problems related to quality, of which they prioritized three. The problem was assessed, targets were set and activities were planned for, presented in a clear table including recourses needed, timing, evidence for completion of activities and who was responsible. This was the time for evaluation and refection.
Dulecha health centre (25km from the Woreda Health Office, four health posts, serving 38,214 population in a poor area), focused on antenatal care (ANC), postnatal care (PNC) and skilled birth attendance. HEWs with their health development armies (HDAs, women from each household assisting the HEW in health promotion) were tasked with early identification of pregnant women. In addition, health education was intensified through pregnant women fora and home visits by HEWs. Performance was evaluated every month; and the zonal level visited the quality improvement team once, to discuss the project. Attendance at the first antenatal visit increased from 63% to 73%, at the fourth from 53% to 68%. Challenges remained: skilled birth attendance (currently at 63%) is to be improved by reducing the drop-out of pregnant women from ANC4 to facility delivery. Furthermore, HDAs need further strengthening and HEW home visits still need to take place more often.
Dobe Toga health centre (catchment population of 34,089) brought about change in ANC1 and 4 (56% to 74%; 49% to 68%) by improving registration of pregnant women, improving feedback to HEWs from the side of the facility and continuous monitoring of pregnant women by HEWs and HDAs.
Abela Lida health centre (serving 28,391 people) reported on the grading of HDAs. A committee with different officials, including HEWs, perform quarterly assessments of households. Based on this, households receive a grade (A, B or C; with A being well performing and C being less well performing). Progress was made with more households deserving an A. This system made me wonder: the publicly announced grade can motivate, but also demotivate community members. The quality improvement team explained that very poor households are helped by the neighbourhood, for example by the provision of materials for pit latrines. Therefore, no one can have an “excuse” not to perform.
Over the past year, Telamo health centre (catchment population of 24,507) focused on improving the acceptance of long term family planning methods and increased service delivery to community members in need of special support. Identification of blind, deaf and elderly people was conducted together with the kebele chairmen, HDAs and HEWs. The poorest people were selected and provided with special support or health services via outreach. The presenter discussed a slide on “quality” versus “equity”, after which a good debate took place on how to achieve equity in all nine health centres that Shebedino has.
Not sure if you have the same feeling from reading the summary above, but I was impressed with the progress made in the nine health centres. What were the mechanisms for success? Based on what transpired during the meetings, I identified the following:
In health systems programming and research, there is a general complaint that positive stories outnumber the negative ones. We should learn more from things that did not work. I definitely agree with this. However, it is also important to write about the positive. Not only we can learn from the mechanisms of success in Shedebino for other districts in Ethiopia and beyond, but stressing the positive also keeps us going.
At the end of the day, heading back to Hawassa on the same bad road, the diversity of people walking, talking, selling and buying – but also struggling, exhausted because of hard working, in pain or feeling too cold – again stressed the idea that improving community health serves even a wider goal than health for all, it is a basis for sustainable economic development.
This project is funded by the European Union.